Selected Flickr






-
Recent
Categories
- Adaptive design (10)
- Architecture (3)
- Art (14)
- Conferences (15)
- Experience design (11)
- Film (10)
- General (14)
- geography (2)
- Graphic design (12)
- Information architecture (3)
- Information design (11)
- Interaction design (32)
- link (9)
- Mapping (17)
- Media (16)
- mediation, (1)
- Mobility (16)
- Narrative (8)
- photo (28)
- Photography (12)
- Place (23)
- Play (3)
- Project (6)
- quote (28)
- Reading (16)
- regular (3)
- Research (26)
- Site related (1)
- Social (10)
- Sound (2)
- Technology (19)
- Television (7)
- Travel (10)
- Ubicomp (15)
- Urbanism (13)
- Usability (7)
- video (23)
Archives
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (8)
- January 2010 (5)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (8)
- September 2009 (20)
- August 2009 (9)
- July 2009 (6)
- June 2009 (51)
- September 2006 (1)
- August 2006 (2)
- December 2005 (2)
- November 2005 (2)
- April 2005 (1)
- March 2005 (1)
- February 2005 (3)
- December 2004 (1)
- November 2004 (2)
- October 2004 (1)
- September 2004 (2)
- August 2004 (2)
- July 2004 (4)
- June 2004 (7)
- May 2004 (2)
- April 2004 (2)
- March 2004 (4)
- February 2004 (1)
- December 2003 (1)
- October 2003 (1)
- September 2003 (1)
- August 2003 (1)
- April 2003 (1)
- February 2003 (1)
- January 2003 (5)
- December 2002 (1)
- September 2002 (3)
- May 2002 (2)
- February 2002 (1)
- November 2001 (1)
- June 2001 (1)
- February 2000 (1)
David’s reference to 18 points as the minimum size equates to 18 pixels if you are coming from a web background.
On some iTV projects I have pushed the type down to 16 pixels, but be very careful about colours and contrast, and enquire about the production path to air: if the work is going to be transferred via DV tape, squeezed through an old composite link, or online-edited with high compression, then you might want to leave type as large as possible.
In some cases – such as using white text on a red background – you can add a very subtle black shadow to the type, which will help stop colour bleed and crawling effects. Even if you dislike drop-shadow effects, it will still look flat and lovely on a broadcast monitor.
Safe areas need to be taken with a pinch of salt. The default safe areas in most editing and compositing software date from years ago before the widespread use of modern, widescreen televisions.
Try extending the safe area for non-essential text in interactive projects, and consult broadcaster guidelines for their widescreen policies: many channels now broadcast in 14:9 to terrestrial boxes, and offer options to satellite and cable viewers.
The largest problem is that widescreen viewers often crop the top and bottom of the image by setting their TV to crop 4:3 to 16:9. Some cable/satellite companies remove the left and right of the image to crop 16:9 to 4:3 for non-widescreen viewers, leaving us only a tiny, safe rectangle in the centre of the image to work with.
Robert Bradbrook (maker of Home Road Movies) has a some technical but excellent information on designing graphics for 16:9 television and film formats, including a sample safe area.
There are also excellent documents on picture standards from the BBC.
But this is one thing I don’t understand: according to the BBC: “Additional [20 or 26 horizontal] pixels are not taken into account when calculating the aspect ratio, but without them images transferred between systems will not be the correct shape.” Can anyone confirm that this is the case for PAL images?